Caught on Camera Again -- Non-Existent Well B

Well B does not exist according to BP. Except that it does, was damaged and this is now the fourth video I have found to prove that not only does it exist, it was damaged along with Well A, which is the only one now seen in the media. But I'm a conspiracy theorist because I can match two sets of numbers.



X=1202525 in this video. Well site B in BP's Initial Exploration Plan is at X=1202514.00. X marks the spot of Well B, ladies and gentlemen, see it for yourselves:




And for any new readers who aren't familiar with my theory, A Tale of Two Wells, I will include the much more common picture of Well A and it's coordinates. Match the numbers for yourselves, it's not at all difficult.




How long will it take for this story to get into the lamestream media? Look at the footage of Well B and tell me that nothing exists there. BP's claim directly to me that they never received permission to drill at site B and never did so nor installed any equipment is patently false. Look at the pictures, match the numbers. BP's management would already be in leg irons if the government and media were both not compromised at every level.

UPDATE:
OK, so five minutes after I posted the above I found a fifth video showing Well B, which does not exist.






If you're wondering why the aspect ration is off in the videos, the person that captured both is the same Youtuber, and evidently mistakenly encoded the videos with a 16:9 ration instead of the correct 4:3. I un-squished the still screens in Photoshop to make it easier for you to read the numbers and also enhanced the contrast a bit.

The same user has dozens and dozens of videos showing the usual Well A, and he or she evidently did not notice the two locations when BP switched, they were just capturing video each day to show that the oil flow rate was getting worse after each failed fix attempt.


UPDATE 2:

OK folks, here's video number 6 of the well which never existed. This is getting easier. This one only took an additional two minutes to find. Why haven't more people discovered this? Ironic that the coordinates on this video are the easiest of the bunch to read, since whoever shot this appears to simply be holding his or her camera in front of a monitor or television. It's plain as day:






And for anyone new who doesn't know the whole back-story, read my earlier posts:

http://jailthebanksters.blogspot.com/2010/08/red-alert-other-well.html

http://jailthebanksters.blogspot.com/2010/08/gone-in-18-seconds-bps-lie-dismissed.html

Thanks to "X2YeZCAMCNC" of Youtube for the first two videos and "mrhappycamper69" for the third.

UPDATE 3:
A user from Youtube name "xsithos" wrote me to explain that he thinks that at least some of these videos actually represent the fallen riser pipe that came crashing down on the ocean floor, having been detached from Deepwater Horizon by the explosion on April 20. I think he may be right about this last video I posted here and possibly about the two quick clips that Russia Today aired. However, I maintain that the other videos that I found myself show more than the riser pipe. I would like to thank "xsithos" for clarifying this for me. He or she is maintaining an open mind as to the possibility of a second well having been built.

Here's my adjusted theory. Everyone knows and saw on TV that BP were running operations to try and clamp that broken riser pipe. Here is what the pipe looks like:


I now think that Deepwater Horizon's riser pipe landed a few feet away from the X-coordinate Well B which was proposed and which I propose was built. I think that the fact that it happened to land there would be convenient for BP because none of the schmucks on TV know what they're looking at in terms of the equipment and its coordinates. Maybe I'm a bigger schmuck for still insisting that Well B was built, was damaged and was filmed leaking but this piece of equipment is not a riser pipe:



Nor is this:


The riser pipe is seen lying horizontal and at an angle, and not painted. It is a simple pipe with no parts attached. According to Transocean's page on Deepwater Horizon the riser pipe is only 21 inches in diameter. And what I think is clearly Well B is sitting there, much larger, painted white, with parts bolted onto it, it is sitting perfectly upright and not at an angle, and it ejecting oil straight up unlike the riser, which is shooting it to the side. Comments are always welcome from the Anonymouses and from SweetBeavis and BurnBP. Let's figure this thing out.


UPDATE 4:
An anonymous commenter brought something back to my attention which had been written by someone to me before, and I simply forgot to update my articles. The Y coordinate for Well B which was printed in the section of BP's Initial Exploration Plan I've been using for the Well A vs. Well B comparison is a typo. The true figure for Well B should appear as Y=10431494, not Y=10434194. No conspiracy here, just a simple keystroke error resulting in the transposition of a '4' and a '1' in the middle of the number.

The anonymous commenter noticed this on his or her own and calculated the correct figure by translating the latitude-longitude figures, but this is confirmed elsewhere in the same Plan -- if you scroll past the first couple of pages you will find a large color map of the site, and the coordinates printed there for site B are the correct ones, corroborating what the commenter noticed. I have been only concentrating on the X coordinate but it's nice of that person to have noticed the error in BP's filing and let me know about it.